Supreme Court seeks $228 million as threats to justices climb
What's new: Court police expect threats to rise 38% this year, and justices cited swatting, drones and AI-driven cyberattacks.
What's new: Court police expect threats to rise 38% this year, and justices cited swatting, drones and AI-driven cyberattacks.
Why it matters: The court wants nearly $15 million for added protection after 564 threats to federal judges in the last fiscal year.
What's next: Trump is still challenging a separate $83.3 million defamation award, though the Supreme Court let the earlier verdict stand.
What’s next: Trump appealed the payout order after the Supreme Court declined to hear his challenge to the 2023 civil verdict.
What’s next: Trump appealed within hours, but the order followed the Supreme Court’s refusal to revisit the 2023 verdict.
What’s next: E. Jean Carroll is set to receive the 2023 judgment plus interest after the Supreme Court declined Trump’s appeal.
What's new: It will be the first time justices appear before Congress since 2019, as court security costs remain a focus.
Why it matters: The 6-3 ruling gives the Trump administration broader power to block claims before migrants step onto U.S. soil.
Why it matters: The 6-3 ruling could let the administration revive "metering," which let officers refuse to process claims at busy crossings.
Why it matters: The 6-3 ruling clears the way for swift deportation risk and could shape TPS cases involving other countries.
Why it matters: The decision could let officials again cap daily asylum processing at ports of entry along the U.S.-Mexico border.
Why it matters: The ruling could wipe out thousands of state failure-to-warn suits over glyphosate and narrow Bayer's legal exposure.
Why it matters: The 6-3 ruling could weaken similar laws in California, New York, New Jersey and Maryland.
Why it matters: The 6-3 ruling lets guns enter many private businesses unless owners explicitly post a ban.
Why it matters: The ruling could wipe out thousands of state failure-to-warn suits tied to glyphosate and protect a proposed $7.25 billion settlement.
Why it matters: The ruling could wipe out many failure-to-warn claims tied to glyphosate, though design-defect cases may still proceed.
What’s new: The 6-3 ruling held a federal prison-religion law protects worship rights but does not let inmates collect money from individual officers.
Why it matters: The ruling broadens a 1996 law Trump activated in 2019, opening more claims over property Cuba seized after the revolution.
What's next: Pedro Hernandez avoids a third trial and remains under a 25-years-to-life sentence in New York.
Why it matters: The striker’s eligibility rests on the 14th Amendment as the Supreme Court weighs Trump’s order within weeks.
What's new: The justices left room to disarm addicts or people carrying guns while intoxicated, but rejected a broader ban on regular users.
What's new: The 9-0 ruling leaves other firearm limits intact, including bans for addicts, intoxicated people and those deemed dangerous.
What's new: Buyer had served nearly two years of a 22-month sentence tied to trades around the Sprint-T-Mobile and Guidehouse-Navigant deals.
Why it matters: The ruling weakens protections for Black voting power and could spur late redistricting fights in other states.
Why it matters: The order leaves Alabama with six Republican-leaning districts and one Democratic-leaning seat for the 2026 midterms.